Retrospective analysis of ophthalmology referrals during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to prepandemic.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to analyse emergency ophthalmology referrals to a Canadian tertiary academic centre during the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in comparison to prepandemic referrals. DESIGN: This was a retrospective chart review looking at emergency referrals seen by the ophthalmology service between March 18 to April 17, 2020 (representing the COVID-19 period), and March 18 to April 17, 2019 (representing the pre-COVID-19 period). METHODS: Data gathered from referral records included patient demographics, timing and site of referral, and ophthalmic diagnosis. Referrals were categorized as urgent or nonurgent, with urgent indicating the need for ophthalmic assessment within 24 hours. RESULTS: The total number of referrals decreased by 54.2% in the COVID-19 period versus the pre-COVID-19 period. There was a similar bimodal age distribution in both periods, with fewer patients over 65 years of age presenting during the pandemic. Tertiary hospital referrals decreased by 62% in the pandemic period, while nontertiary emergency department referral trends varied and outpatient clinic referrals increased by 16%. Overall, there was a significant shift in the distribution of referral sites (p = 0.04). The proportion of urgent referrals increased by 14% during the pandemic; this was not statistically significant. There was no significant change in the timing of referrals or in the distribution of diagnostic segments. CONCLUSIONS: This study offers insight into the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on ophthalmology referral patterns in a Canadian context. Moving forward, it helps to guide resource allocation and public education on the importance of seeking necessary eye care.

Local anaesthesia as a standard of care for penetrating keratoplasty?

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To determine preferences in the use of local anaesthesia (LA) versus general anaesthesia (GA) for penetrating keratoplasty (PK), and to examine the safety of LA for PK. SUBJECTS/METHODS: A retrospective analysis of PKs performed at an ophthalmology department in Canada from 01/01/2008 to 01/01/2020 was conducted to investigate rate of major complications. A questionnaire was also sent out to cornea specialists in the United Kingdom (UK) and Canada to determine trends in anaesthesia use for PK. Data on anaesthesia use in keratoplasty data was also obtained from the National Health Service Blood and Tissue (NHSBT) register. RESULTS: The retrospective study found that 2143 PKs were performed under LA by 4 surgeons. The following complications were revealed: 1 acute anxiety attack with tachycardia, 3 extraocular myotoxicity cases requiring squint surgery, 1 expulsive suprachoroidal haemorrhage and 1 retrobulbar haemorrhage. The survey revealed 92% of cornea specialists in Canada preferred LA to GA. In the UK, 4.5% of specialists preferred LA, with most preferring GA due to suprachoroidal haemorrhage risk. NHSBT data revealed that 86.6% of 6181 PKs performed in UK between 01/04/2015 and 31/03/2020 were done under GA. CONCLUSIONS: LA is preferred for PK in Canada, in contrast to the UK where GA is preferred. Our retrospective study suggests a low incidence of LA-related complications. We suggest that LA should be considered for most cornea transplant techniques, including optical penetrating keratoplasty. Rising worldwide keratoplasty numbers, ageing populations and risks of pandemics (e.g. COVID-19) give more reason for reduced reliance on GA.

Quantification of aerosol generation during cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To determine whether phacoemulsification cataract surgery is an aerosol-generating medical procedure (AGMP) and, therefore, to help determine the personal protective equipment required by healthcare providers in the era of the COVID-19. SETTING: The Surgery, Teaching and Research Wet Lab of the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, UBC. DESIGN: Laboratory-based simulation. METHODS: Phacoemulsification cataract surgery was performed on porcine eyes. At a fixed distance, a DRX Aerosol Monitor 8534 (DustTrak) was used to measure particulate matter (PM) mass fractions for each of 3 particle sizes, PM1, PM2.5, and PM4 (in microns), every 2 seconds during surgery and for 1 minute after. The main outcome measure was an increase in the mass fraction of aerosolized particles of various sizes. RESULTS: There was no significant aerosolization of particles during cataract surgery for both the 2.4 and 2.75 mm wound sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Phacoemulsification cataract surgery was not found to be an AGMP. In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, ophthalmologists can continue to use droplet precautions while performing this surgery.